1. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma // Kant I. Sochineniya na russkom i nemetskom yazykakh. M.: Nauka, 1994–2006. T. II. Ch.1, T. II. Ch.2.
2. Kant I. Kants gesammelte Schriften (Akademie Ausgabe; AA), Königlichen Preußischen (later Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. (Berlin: Georg Reimer (later Walter De Gruyter), 1900–.
3. Kant I. O voprose, predlozhennom na premiyu korolevskoj berlinskoj akademiej nauk v 1791 godu: kakie dejstvitel'nye uspekhi sdelala metafizika v Germanii so vremen Lejbnitsa i Vol'fa? // Kant I. Sochineniya v 6-ti tt. [pod obschej redaktsiej V.M.Asmusa i dr., M.: Mysl', 1966, T.6, S.177–256.
4. Kant I. Metafizicheskie nachala estestvoznaniya // Kant I. Sochineniya v 6-ti tt. [pod obschej redaktsiej V.M. Asmusa i dr., M.: Mysl', 1966, T.6, S.53–176.
5. Kant I. Iz rukopisnogo naslediya (materialy k «Kritike chistogo razuma», Opus postumum). M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.
6. Kant I. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, trans. and ed. P. Carus, rev. J. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977 (na russkom: Kant I. Prolegomeny ko vsyakoj buduschej metafizike, kotoraya mozhet poyavit'sya kak nauka // Kant I. Soch. v 8-mi tt. T.4, M.: Choro, 1994.
7. Kant I. Lectures on Metaphysics, trans. and ed. K. Ameriks & S. Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
8. Kant I. Lectures on Logic, trans. and ed. J.M.Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
9. Kant I. Natural Science, trans. and ed. E.Watkins et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
10. Kant I. Theoretical Philosophy After 1781, trans. and ed. H. Allison & P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2002.
11. Kant I. Notes and Fragments, trans. and ed. P. Guyer et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005
12. Allison H. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. An Interpretation and Defense. Revised & Enlarged Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
13. Ameriks K. Kant and the Historical Turn. Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
14. Baum M. ‘Systemform und Selbsterkenntnis der Vernunft bei Kant’ // H. Fulda & J. Stolzenburg (eds) Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants. Hamburg: Meiner, 2001, pp. 25–40.
15. Bird G. The Revolutionary Kant. A Commentary on the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. Chicago/La Salle, IL: Open Court, 2006.
16. Cassam Q. The Possibility of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
17. Copernicus N. Das Neue Weltbild. Drei Texte: Commentariolus, Brief gegen Werne, De revolutionibus (ed. H. Zekl). Hamburg: Meiner, 1990.
18. Copernicus N. On the Revolutions (new edition, trans. and ed. E. Rosen). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
19. Friedman M. Philosophy of Natural Science //Guyer P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 303–41.
20. Gardner S. Kant and the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. London/New York: Routledge, 1999.
21. Guyer P. Kant. London/New York: Routledge, 2006.
22. Hanson N. Copernicus’ Role in Kant’s Revolution’ // Journal of the History of Ideas, V. XX (2), 1959, pp.274–81.
23. Kemp Smith N. (1913) ‘The Meaning of Kant’s Copernican Analogy’, Mind XXII (88), 1913, pp.549–51.
24. Kemp Smith N. Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason (1923), Amherst: Humanity Press, 1999, P.22–25.
25. Kuhn T. The Copernican Revolution. Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought, renewed edition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
26. Kuhn T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
27. Miles M. Kant’s “Copernican Revolution”: Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason’ // Kant-Studien V. 97(1), 2006, pp.1–32 (sm. perevod dannoj stat'i v ehtom vypuske zhurnala).
28. Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations. London/New York: Routledge, 2002.
29. Prauss G. ‘Zum Wahrheitsproblem bei Kant’ //Prauss G. (ed.) Kant. Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen und Handeln. Cologne: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1973, pp. 73–89.
30. Price H. ‘Causal Perspectivalism’, in H. Price & R. Corry (eds) Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality. Russell’s Republic Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp.250–92.
31. Russell B. Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits. London: Allen & Unwin, 1948 (na russkom: Rassel B. Chelovecheskoe znanie, ego sfery i granitsy. M.: Terra – Knizhnyj klub, respublika, 2000).
32. Schulting D. Kant’s Copernican Analogy: Beyond the Nonspecific Reading // Studi kantiani, Vol. 22, 2009, pp.39–65
33. Schulting D. Kant’s Radical Subjectivism. Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction (London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
34. Schulting D. ‘Kant’s Idealism and Phenomenalism. A Critical Notice of Lucy Allais’s Manifest Reality. Kant’s Idealism and His Realism’, Studi kantiani XXX, 2017, pp.191–202.
35. Schulting D. Kant’s Deduction From Apperception. An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories, second and revised edition. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2018.
36. Schönecker D., Schulting D., Strobach N. Kants kopernikanischnewtonische Analogie // Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Vol. 54, № 4, 2011, P.497–518.
37. Strawson P.F. The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’(2-nd printing) London: Methuen, 1968.
38. Van Cleve J. Problems from Kant (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Comments
No posts found